Allgemeine Kritik an den Corona-Maßnahmen

Aus FreeWiki
Version vom 14. Januar 2021, 23:40 Uhr von Thomas (Diskussion | Beiträge)
(Unterschied) ← Nächstältere Version | Aktuelle Version (Unterschied) | Nächstjüngere Version → (Unterschied)
Zur Navigation springen Zur Suche springen

 

the effectiveness of most German interventions remains questionable. Moreover, assessing of interventions is impeded by the estimation of true infection dates and the influence of test volume.

Stringency of the measures settled to fight pandemia, including lockdown, did not appear to be linked with death rate.

For adults living with children there is no evidence of an increased risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes. These findings have implications for determining the benefit-harm balance of children attending school in the COVID-19 pandemic.

Belarus’s ... President Aleksander Lukashenko, ... has flatly denied the seriousness of the pandemic, refusing to impose a lockdown, close schools, or cancel mass events like the Belarusian football league or the Victory Day parade.

Yet the country’s death rate is among the lowest in Europe—just over 700 in a population of 9.5 million with over 73 000 confirmed cases.

Our findings ... further raise doubt about the importance in NPI’s (lockdown policies in particular) in accounting for the evolution of COVID-19 transmission rates over time and across locations.

Evaluated as a whole, at a first glance, the lockdown policies of the Spring of 2020 therefore appear to

be substantial long-run government failures.